Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Saif, Samia
- Calculation and Estimation of the Carbon Footprint of Paint Industry
Abstract Views :137 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Environmental Consultancies and Options (ECO), 31 Commercial Area, 3rd Floor, Cavalary Ground, Lahore, PK
2 Department of Environmental Sciences, Kinnaird College for Women, Lahore, PK
1 Environmental Consultancies and Options (ECO), 31 Commercial Area, 3rd Floor, Cavalary Ground, Lahore, PK
2 Department of Environmental Sciences, Kinnaird College for Women, Lahore, PK
Source
Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, Vol 14, No 3 (2015), Pagination: 633-638Abstract
The world's climate is changing rapidly, and these changes are having detrimental impacts on human health and the environment. Major part of it is contributed by the anthropogenic activities. The current study is undertaken for the estimation and calculation of the carbon footprint of the paint industry. In order to find out the greenhouse gas emissions released by the industry, the carbon footprint of the industry was calculated following the greenhouse gas (GHG's) protocol guidelines. The study includes emissions from different sources. Scope 1 emissions account for the direct emissions, these include emissions from industry owned boilers, generators, furnaces and vehicles. The Scope 2 emissions account for the indirect emissions, emitted from purchased electricity and natural gas generation. And Scope 3 emissions include emissions generated from waste disposal and employee business travel. The highest amount of emissions was released from Scope 1 which was 714 tCO2e followed by Scope 2 emissions which were calculated to be 703.011 tCO2e and then Scope 3 emissions which were 105.733 tCO2e. The total carbon footprint calculated for the industry was 2105.733 tCO2e.Keywords
Carbon Footprint, Paint Industry, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, Direct Emissions, Indirect Emissions.- Five Year Carbon Footprint of a Textile Industry:A Podium to Incorporate Sustainability
Abstract Views :208 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Kinnaird College for Women, 93 Jail Road, Lahore, 54000, PK
2 Environmental Consultancies & Options, Cavalry Ground, Lahore, 54000, PK
3 College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Quaid-e-Azam Campus, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54900, PK
1 Kinnaird College for Women, 93 Jail Road, Lahore, 54000, PK
2 Environmental Consultancies & Options, Cavalry Ground, Lahore, 54000, PK
3 College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Quaid-e-Azam Campus, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54900, PK
Source
Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, Vol 16, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 125-132Abstract
The world is experiencing deteriorating climatic changes which are significantly resulting from the increased emission of greenhouse gases. This research highlights the major activities of a textile industry that release greenhouse gases and then focuses on calculating the carbon foot print of the industry for last 5 years. Further, this study also links up the calculated carbon footprint with the environmental sustainability. The methodology adopted to calculate carbon footprint was in accordance to the GHG protocol guidelines. The study emphasizes the different emission sources including scope 1 emission which take into account direct emissions resulting from industry owned activities. The scope 2 are indirect emissions that emit due to the purchase of electricity, natural gas and the biogas emissions resulting from waste disposal. Scope 3 emissions were not accounted in the current study based upon its complexity. Scope 1 emissions were found to contribute greatest in total carbon footprint. The results symbolized an ascending trend in the carbon footprint of the industry over past five years. This ascending trend also denoted that very less environmental sustainability has been achieved by the industry in last five years. Carbon footprint calculated for the base year 2014 was 42867.72tCO2e.Keywords
Carbon Footprint, Textile Industry, Sustainability.References
- Gillen, M. 2012. What is wrong with ‘real’ carbon offsets? Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management, 2(4): 167-170.
- Kemp, S. Williams, and I. Laurence, A. 2011. Carbon foot printing: towards a universally accepted definition. Carbon Management, 2(1): 61-72.
- Parry, M.L. Canziani, O.F. Palutikof. J.P. and Van der Linden, C.E. 2007. Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 976.
- Ranganathan, J. Corbier, L. Bhatia, P. Schmitz, S. Gage, P. and Oren, K. 2004. The greenhouse gas protocol: a corporate accounting and reporting standard (revised edition). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
- Saif, S. Feroz, A. Khan, A. M. Akhtar, S. and Mehmood, A. 2015. Calculation and estimation of the carbon footprint of paint industry. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 14(3): 633-638.
- USEPA 2006. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Global Mitigation of Non CO2 Greenhouse Gases” http://www.epa.gov/ nonco2/econ-inv/international.html. Accessed 6 September, 2014.
- USEPA 2008. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Quantifying Greenhouse gas emission” working draft, 15-1.